Cucurbit[7]uril Host–Guest Complexes with Biguanidinium Cations in Aqueous Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The host–guest complexations of a series of biguanidinium cations (metformin and phenformin) and bis(biguanidinium) dications (chlorhexidine and alexidine) by the host molecule cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) in aqueous solution have been investigated by 1 H NMR spectroscopy and ESI mass spectrometry. Metformin forms both 1:2 and 1:1 host–guest complexes, whereas phenformin forms only a 1:1 complex. The two bis(biguanidinium) dications both form sequential 1:1, 2:1 and 3:1 host–guest complexes, however, the mechanism is different in each case. With chlorhexidine, the first CB[7] binds to the central hexamethylene chain, followed by sequential complexation of the terminal 4‐chlorophenyl groups. With alexidine, the two terminal 2‐ethylhexyl groups are bound first, with the third CB[7] adding only with a concomitant relocation of one CB[7] to the central hexamethylene binding site. The stability constants of the various host–guest complexes were determined by 1 H NMR titrations and competitive binding experiments, as well as by the application of a statistical binding model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".