MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1484760451

Multiculturalism and International Law: Essays in Honour of Edward Mcwhinney

2009· book· en· W1484760451 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edward McWhinney, Sienho Yee, Jacques-Yvan Morin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational lawPolitical scienceLawInternational courtMulticulturalismLegal pluralismComparative lawPublic international lawSociologyLegal realism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PREFACE by the Editors AVANT-PROPOS par Boutros Boutros-Ghali FOREWORD by Shigeru Oda E. McWhinney: Biography Bibliography Multiculturalism and General Theories of International Law J.-Y. Morin : L'ordre juridique international et l'ethique du bien commun dans l'ere de la mondialisation R. Mullerson: From E Unum Pluribus to E Pluribus Unum in the Journey from an African Village to a Global Village? Duan Jielong: The Concept of the Harmonious World: An Important Contribution to International Relations H. Koechler: Civilization and World Order: The Relevance of the Civilizational Paradigm in Contemporary International Law A. G. Koroma: International Law and Multiculturalism H. Thirlway: Reflections on Multiculturalism and International Law V.S. Vereshchetin: Cultural and Ideological Pluralism and International Law: Revisited 20 Years on M. Rama-Montaldo: Universalism and Particularisms in the Creation Process of International Law J. van Aggelen: The Shift in the Perception of Multiculturalism at the United Nations since 1945 K. Doehring: Democracy and International Law S. Yee: The Intrinsic and Instrumental Values of Diversity: Some Philosophical and Legal Considerations Multiculturalism and International Organizations and Courts C. Dominice: Federalisme et mise en oeuvre du droit international S. Talmon: Participation of UN Member States in the Work of the Organization: A Multicultural Alternative to Present-Day Regionalism? B. Vukas: Some Provisions of the Statute of the International Court of Justice which Deserve Amendments M. Kawano: The Administration of Justice by the International Court of Justice and the Parties S. Sucharitkul: Legal Multiculturalism and the International Law Commission P. Kirsch: The International Criminal Court: Building on the Principal Legal Systems of the World N. Ando: Multiculturalism and the Human Rights Committee B. S. Brown: Multiculturalism and the Bretton Woods Institutions W. E. Holder: International Organizations and Governance of the International Monetary Fund D. Vignes: L'Union europeenne, acteur civil et militaire dans la gestion des crises internationales: la PESD, politique europeenne de securite et de defense L. Galenskaya: The International Institutional System and International Non-Governmental Organizations Multiculturalism and the Progressive Development in Substantive International Law S. Murase: Unilateral Responses to International Terrorism: Self-defense or Law Enforcement? P. H. Kooijmans: The Legality of the Use of Force in the Recent Case Law of the International Court of Justice R. Bernhardt: International Protection of Human Rights: Universalism and Regionalism A. A. Cancado Trindade: The Right to Cultural Identity in the Evolving Jurisprudential Construction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights C. F.J. Doebbler: Danish Cartoons: Freedom of Speech versus Freedom of Religion? V.-D. Degan: Two Faces of Multiculturalism in Present International Law R. Wolfrum: Kosovo: Some Thoughts on its Future Status B. Aurescu: Minorities in Europe: Recent Trends M. Clech Lam: We the [Indigenous] Peoples of the United Nations M. Bothe: Multiculturalism and the Development of International Humanitarian Law Bing Bing Jia: Multiculturalism and the Development of the System of International Criminal Law C. Osborn Wright: Toward a New Cultural Exemption in the WTO M. Ragazzi: Multiculturalism and Church-State Concordats D. Turp: Le consentement de l'Etat du Quebec aux engagements internationaux et sa participation aux forums internationaux INDEX THE CONTRIBUTORS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsFrench-language works237,207