MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1485145722 · doi:10.22621/cfn.v123i4.1009

Sixth Annual Meeting of the Alliance of Natural History Museums of Canada 2009; Canadian Association of Herpetologists Bulletin; Marine Turtle Newsletter

2009· article· en· W1485145722 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Francis R. Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllianceNatural historyTurtle (robot)GeographyLibrary scienceFisheryArchaeologyBiologyEcologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leaders of Canada's major natural history museums convened in Ottawa on 26 and 27 October 2009 for the sixth annual meeting of the Alliance of Natural History Museums of Canada (ANHMC).The network was created in 2003 to enhance collaborative work in the areas of research, collections development, and education about the natural environment.Pauline Rafferty, CEO of the Alliance and Director of the Royal British Columbia Museum, stressed the continuing national strategy for developing a collection that will represent all of Canada's biodiversity.The Alliance's 16 members from west to north to east are the Royal British Columbia Museum, the Vancouver Aquarium, the Royal Alberta Museum, the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, the Yukon Beringia Interpretive Centre, the Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre, the Royal Saskatchewan Museum, the Manitoba Museum, the Royal Ontario Museum, the Canadian Museum of Nature, the Toronto Zoo, Montreal's nature museums (Biodôme, Insectarium, Botanical Gardens, and Planetarium), the Redpath Museum (Montreal), the New Brunswick Museum, the Nova Scotia Museum of Natural History, and The Rooms Provincial Museum, Newfoundland and Labrador.These institutions are responsible for preserving the record of Canada's natural history through time.Together, member museums safeguard more than 19 million catalogued specimens of plants, animals, minerals, and fossils collected over 150 years.The purpose of the national collections strategy is to ensure that this crucial record is complete and is preserved in perpetuity.At a special reception held the evening of 27 October on Parliament Hill, the third annual Bruce Naylor Award was presented.This honour recognizes significant contributions to the study of museum-based natural history in Canada.The 2009 recipient was Dr. Robert Cannings, a notable entomologist from British Columbia.Dr. Cannings' contributions as a biologist go back decades, from his early days as a naturalist and nature interpreter to his 29 years as Curator of Entomology at the Royal British Columbia Museum in Victoria.He has authored several books, published more than 100 peer-reviewed scientific articles, and written over 100 popular articles.Under his curatorship, the Museum's entomology collection has grown from a few thousand specimens to the present collection of over 250 000.He has also written text for, and contributed to the planning of, a wide range of museum

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1090.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist→Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→