Ephrin-A1 Induces c-Cbl Phosphorylation and EphA Receptor Down-Regulation in T Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eph receptor tyrosine kinases are expressed by T lineage cells, and stimulation with their ligands, the ephrins, has recently been shown to modulate T cell behavior. We show that ephrin-A1 stimulation of Jurkat T cells induces tyrosine phosphorylation of EphA3 receptors and cytoplasmic proteins, including the c-cbl proto-oncogene. Cbl phosphorylation was also observed in peripheral blood T cells. In contrast, stimulation of Jurkat cells with the EphB receptor ligand ephrin-B1 does not cause Cbl phosphorylation. EphA activation also induced Cbl association with Crk-L and Crk-II adapters, but not the related Grb2 protein. Induction of Cbl phosphorylation upon EphA activation appeared to be dependent upon Src family kinase activity, as Cbl phosphorylation was selectively abrogated by the Src family inhibitor 4-amino-5(4-chlorophenyl-7-(tert-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine, while EphA phosphorylation was unimpaired. Ephrin-A1 stimulation of Jurkat cells was also found to cause down-regulation of endogenous EphA3 receptors from the cell surface and their degradation. In accordance with the role of Cbl as a negative regulator of receptor tyrosine kinases, overexpression of wild-type Cbl, but not its 70-Z mutant, was found to down-regulate EphA receptor expression. Receptor down-regulation could also be inhibited by blockage of Src family kinase activity. Our findings show that EphA receptors can actively signal in T cells, and that Cbl performs multiple roles in this signaling pathway, functioning to transduce signals from the receptors as well as regulating activated EphA receptor expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".