Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed an immense outpouring of published literature under the general heading of ‘Sustainable Agriculture‘. In preparing a report on “Sustainable agriculture and food security“ for the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development a scientific Commission of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) reviewed some 300 related publications [ICSU-CASAFA 1991]. The Commission reported how ‘sustainable agriculture‘ is treated from a diversity of scientific, pseudo-scientific, biological, ecological, ideological and philosophical perspectives. The following are a sample of relevant significant publications referred to in the Commission's report: Agriculture Canada [1989], Altieri [1983], Boeringer [1980], Brown [1987], Brundtland [1987b], Bunting [1987], CGIAR/TAC [1989], Edwards et al [1990], FAO [1984], Harwood [1990], Jain [1983], NRC/NAS [1989], NABC [1989], Rodale [1983], Reganold and Papendick [1990], Swaminathan and Sinha [1986]. During the succeeding decade many more have been added.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it