Evaluación de mezclas arcillas con adición de tobas vítreas para la fabricación ladrillos cerámicos Bayamo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se realizo el estudio de una mezcla compuesta por arcilla y tobas vitreas para la produccion de ladrillos, en La Canada; provincia Granma, para su posible utilizacion en la Industria de Materiales de la Construccion, utilizando esta como aditivo para los ladrillos de barro; a partir de sus propiedades fisico-mecanicas. Para ello se caracterizaron los materiales de acuerdo a su composicion quimica y sus propiedades fisicas. Se elaboraron 36 probetas de las cuales se hicieron 9 con un contenido de arcilla solamente y las restantes con 10, 15 y 20 % de aditivo tobas vitreas respectivamente, las cuales se sometieron a ensayos de contraccion natural, peso, absorcion de agua y resistencia a la compresion mecanica para determinar el comportamiento fisico mecanico en cada una de las probetas durante todo el paquete tecnologico. Se comprueba que la mas eficiente es la muestra a la que se le anadio un 10% de aditivo, porque absorbe mayor cantidad de agua y es mas resistente a la compresion, por lo tanto el ladrillo presenta una vida util mas larga.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".