MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1485871178

Midwife-Healers in Canadian Mennonite Immigrant Communities: Women who “made things right”

2007· article· en· W1485871178 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Marlene Epp

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Farm Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationSettlement (finance)EthnologyEmpireChildbirthDiversity (politics)Political scienceHistoryGender studiesHumanitiesSociologyArtLawPregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For Mennonites who immigrated from Pennsylvania to Upper Canada beginning in the early nineteenth century and for those who arrived from the Russian Empire later that century and from the Soviet Union beginning in the 1920s, the community midwife served multiple purposes: not only did she assist at numerous births when hospital deliveries and physicians were rare or inaccessible, but she also provided a wide range of essential health care services that were crucial to individuals and families experiencing the trauma of uprooting and the challenges of rural settlement. Community and family studies profile some of the more prominent midwives in early Mennonite settlement communities, supplementing the information found in the midwifery journal of Mennonite immigrant Sarah Dekker Thielman. While women such as Sarah did hold characteristics that fit the image of the “neighbour” midwife, a concept that has dominated historical portrayals of women who assist at childbirth, their personal lives and chosen career paths exhibited a great deal more diversity. Chez les Mennonites qui ont immigre de la Pennsylvanie au Haut-Canada au debut du XIXe siecle et chez ceux qui sont arrives de l’Empire russe plus tard durant ce siecle et de l’Union sovietique au debut des annees 1920, la sage-femme du village s’acquittait de roles multiples : non seulement aidait-elle souvent les femmes a accoucher la ou les hopitaux et les medecins etaient rares ou inaccessibles, mais elle offrait egalement une foule de services de sante essentiels qui etaient cruciaux pour les personnes et les familles aux prises avec le traumatisme du deracinement et les defis de l’etablissement en milieu rural. Des etudes sur les communautes et les familles dressent le profil de certaines des plus eminentes sages-femmes des premiers etablissements de pionniers mennonites, etoffant l’information trouvee dans le journal de sage-femme de l’immigrante mennonite Sarah Dekker Thielman. Si des femmes telles que Thielman correspondaient bel et bien a l’image typique de la sage-femme du « voisinage », un concept qui a domine la representation historique des femmes aidant a l'accouchement, leur vie personnelle et leurs choix de carriere logeaient a l'enseigne d’une diversite beaucoup plus grande.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicAgriculture and Farm SafetyFrench-language works237,207