MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1486787043

Cincuentenario de la vacuna Salk

2005· article· es· W1486787043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J Kumate

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr.Jesus Kumate El terror estacional de los padres y ninos en el mundo industrializado ter-mino el 12 de abril de 1955, cuando el profesor Thomas Francis, delDepartamento de Epidemiologia de la Escuela de Salud Publica,Universi-dad de Michigan en Ann Arbor, anuncio que la vacuna anti poliomielitiscon virus inactivados era:efectiva,inocua e inmunogenica.Desde el 11 de abril de 1954 a marzo de 1955 se habia realizado unensayo clinico de la vacuna trivalente en ninos escolares del primero altercer grado de escuelas publicas de Estados Unidos y ensayos simulta-neos en Canada y Finlandia.Un ensayo fue doble ciego,aleatorio en 221 998 alumnos de segundoano,que recibieron tres dosis de vacuna en los tiempos cero,primera yquinta semanas del inicio y 321 315 ninos de primero y tercer ano,a losque se administro un placebo en los mismos tiempos que los vacunados.Un grupo de 749 326 alumnos de primero,segundo y tercer ano reci-bieron alternativamente vacuna o placebo:Durante el estudio se cultivaron 426 cepas de poliovirus:238 (55.9%)serotipo 1,53 (12%) serotipo 2 y 135 (31.7%) serotipo 3.La proteccion vacunal segun el serotipo fue:68% para el poliovirus 1100% frente al poliovirus 292%

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de MéxicoSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207