MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evolution of C2H2 Zinc‐finger Gene Families in Mammals

2010· other· en· W1487181076 on OpenAlexaff
Hamsa D. Tadepally, Muriel Aubry

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Life Sciences · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneZinc fingerGenomeGene familyGene duplicationGeneticsSubfamilyKrüppelLineage (genetic)Homology (biology)Human genomeTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The C2H2 zinc‐finger encode the largest class of transcription factors and second largest gene family in the human genome. Based on the presence or absence of an N ‐terminal effector domain, they are grouped into different subfamilies. The KRAB (Kruppel‐associated box) C2H2‐ZNF subfamily, found specifically in tetrapods, constitutes about half of these genes in human and mouse. Often found in clusters, the C2H2‐ZNF genes have evolved independently in various species at the level of genes, effector motifs and the zinc‐finger region. More specifically, in recent times there has been an unprecedented expansion of these genes in mammalian genomes. Cross‐species comparisons reveal a series of dynamic duplications and gene loss events that led to rapid and lineage‐specific evolution of these genes in different vertebrate genomes. Both lineage‐specific variation in the number, sequence and subfamilies of C2H2‐ZNF genes and differential expansion in genomes may be determinant for functions related to speciation. Key Concepts: C2H2‐ZNF genes are ubiquitously present in all organisms ranging from bacteria to human and are often arranged in a clustered organisation. A massive expansion in the number of C2H2‐ZNF genes occurred from yeast to primates. Besides gene duplication, loss and to a certain extent pseudogenisation are contributing factors in the evolution of the C2H2‐ZNF gene family. C2H2‐ZNF genes follow the ‘Birth and Death’ model of evolution contributing to differential and independent evolution of the C2H2‐ZNF genes in different genomes. C2H2‐ZNF genes encode DNA‐ and RNA‐binding proteins presumably involved in gene expression as transcription factors or possibly RNA regulators. Members of the C2H2‐ZNF family are characterised by tandemly repeated zinc‐finger motifs involved in nucleic acid binding and are grouped into different subfamilies based on their N ‐terminal regulatory domains which include SCAN, KRAB, BTB, HOMEO and SET domains. Because of their tandemly repeated zinc‐finger motifs, members of the C2H2‐ZNF family are named multifingered C2H2‐ZNF genes. These motifs are prone to be duplicated, lost or to degenerate during evolution. The KRAB and SCAN domains are solely confined to vertebrates. In all vertebrates, the KRAB domain is found within C2H2‐ZNF proteins. The KRAB domain‐encoding C2H2‐ZNF genes define the largest and a rapidly evolving C2H2‐ZNF subfamily in vertebrates and particularly in mammals. The study of the evolution of the C2H2‐ZNF genes in various genomes may help to elucidate their possible role in functions associated with speciation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Life SciencesSame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207