MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1487549780 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5301

STAT5 Is Essential for Akt/p70S6 Kinase Activity during IL-2-Induced Lymphocyte Proliferation

2007· article· en· W1487549780 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Lockyer, Eric Tran, Brad H. Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsProtein kinase BSTAT5Signal transductionCell biologyBiologyPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayCell growthCancer researchBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IL-2R activates two distinct signaling pathways mediated by the adaptor protein Shc and the transcription factor STAT5. Prior mutagenesis studies of the IL-2R have indicated that the Shc and STAT5 pathways are redundant in the ability to induce lymphocyte proliferation. Yet paradoxically, T cells from STAT5-deficient mice fail to proliferate in response to IL-2, suggesting that the Shc pathway is unable to promote mitogenesis in the genetic absence of STAT5. Here we show in the murine lymphocyte cell line Ba/F3 that low levels of STAT5 activity are essential for Shc signaling. In the absence of STAT5 activity, Shc was unable to sustain activation of the Akt/p70S6 kinase pathway or promote lymphocyte proliferation and viability. Restoring STAT5 activity via a heterologous receptor rescued Shc-induced Akt/p70S6 kinase activity and cell proliferation with kinetics consistent with a transcriptional mechanism. Thus, STAT5 appears to regulate the expression of one or more unidentified components of the Akt pathway. Our results not only explain the severe proliferative defect in STAT5-deficient T cells but also provide mechanistic insight into the oncogenic properties of STAT5 in various leukemias and lymphomas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207