Le mal de vivre : comportements et idéations suicidaires chez les cégépiens de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Suicide among youth is a subject of growing concern. Successful suicides, however, represent only a slight part of the total problem. A study conducted with 666 francophones students attending four C.E.G.E.P. in the Montreal territory reveals that 21.2 % of them say that they have already experienced serious suicidal ideation. 12.2 % have had these experiences within the last twelve months. There are also 3.6 % of the students who admitted to having attempted suicide during the same period, and 8.1 % during their lifetime. More than half of the students say they also have experienced suicidal obsessions such as a fear or a desire to throw themselves in front of the metro. Parental separation and poor health represent the two most serious risk factors. Nearly three quarters of the people who have had serious suicidal thoughts have thought of plans or have confided them to members of their social circle... The reaction of the milieu was reported as positive in only half the cases. Clinical interviews with 25 of the respondents showed that the suicidal ideation reported, corresponded, in almost all cases, with a period of great anguish. The fact of thinking of suicide did have, on the other hand, some positive effects in producing awareness of the possibility of a control over one's destiny.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".