Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Les préoccupations morales semblent actuellement émerger dans les sociétésoccidentales. La philosophie morale trouve dans des auteurs commeHabermas en Allemagne ou comme Comte-Spainville, Etchegoyen et Ferry enFrance des théoriciens de la crise des valeurs et des défenseurs etillustrateurs des questions éthiques. Comme d´autres sociétés occidentales, leQuébec est confronté aux questions morales auxquelles il tente de trouver sesréponses, adaptées à sa tradition chrétienne et à ses aspirations modernes.Le texte qui suit analysera les formes que ce mouvement a pris dans le mondede l´éducation en partant de trois points de vue différents. Le premier point devue, plus théorique, précisera les relations entre morale et éthique et l´apportde la philosophie de l´éducation dans l´élaboration d´une éthique del´éducation. Le second point de vue, plus pédagogique, présentera laperception de futurs enseignants québécois par rapport aux questionséthiques liées à leur profession. Le troisième point de vue, plus sociologique,abordera l´impact du mouvement de professionnalisation dans l´élaborationd´une éthique du métier d´enseignant."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".