A New Split-Radix FHT Algorithm for Length-<tex>$q*2^m$</tex>DHTs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a new split-radix fast Hartley transform (FHT) algorithm is proposed for computing the discrete Hartley transform (DHT) of an arbitrary length N=q*2/sup m/, where q is an odd integer. The basic idea behind the proposed FHT algorithm is that a mixture of radix-2 and radix-8 index maps is used in the decomposition of the DHT. This idea and the use of an efficient indexing process lead to a new decomposition different from that of the existing split-radix FHT algorithms, since the existing ones are all based on the use of a mixture of radix-2 and radix-4 index maps. The proposed algorithm reduces substantially the operations such as data transfer, address generation, and twiddle factor evaluation or access to the lookup table, which contribute significantly to the execution time of FHT algorithms. It is shown that the arithmetic complexity (multiplications+additions) of the proposed algorithm is, in almost all cases, the same as that of the existing split-radix FHT algorithm for length- q*2/sup m/ DHTs. Since the proposed algorithm is expressed in a simple matrix form, it facilitates an easy implementation of the algorithm, and allows for an extension to the multidimensional case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".