MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488335353 · doi:10.21083/csieci.v1i2.20

Uptown Conversation: The New Jazz Studies

2005· article· fr· W1488335353 on OpenAlex
Howard Spring

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationJazzCommunicationCognitive scienceArtPsychologyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How far jazz has come. Once routinely associated with swiveling hips, various drugs of choice, and unruly goings-on, it now has moved to the heart of the cultural establishment. Today, jazz is supported by major foundations, taught at most centres of higher learning, embraced by powerful institutions such as the Lincoln Center and the Smithsonian Institute, and honoured by the White House; there are no more dingy dives for this music. For some, this development represents the kind of attention that jazz deserves. For others, it is the death knell for a once-living art form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it