MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1488665367 · doi:10.1109/ktsc.1995.569153

Is the UN-organisation a lost case? The vulnerability of devotional and the invulnerability of aggressive relationships

2002· article· en· W1488665367 on OpenAlexaff
Rudolf Starkermann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Conflict and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggressionLeagueGlobeCharterPower (physics)Vulnerability (computing)United Nations CharterAction (physics)Political scienceLawPsychologyComputer securitySocial psychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United Nations charter was signed by 51 nations in San Francisco on June 26, 1945. Its intention is to maintain world peace and to promote cooperation among nations. It consists of 159 countries all around the globe. The preceding organisation, the League of Nations (1919), which pursued the same goal, failed drastically due to unability to prevent the 2nd World War. If the main purpose of the UN is to maintain peace on Earth, then it has also already failed-and also as drastically as the League of Nations. This paper demonstrates in social-mathematical quantified terms that it is an irrefutable natural law that aggressive relationships will dominate over peaceful behaviour and that aggression has the following advantages over devotion. Aggression (a) provides more will-power in action, (b) acts faster, (c) has a much wider range of stable existence than devotion, and (d) is practically invulnerable to external influences compared to the utmost vulnerable devotion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolitical Conflict and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207