Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract:The British Columbia College of Teachers operated from 1987 to 2011, a period extraordinary for the amount of conflict generated. The British Columbia Teachers’ Federation appeared to view the College not as a professional association, but as an extension of the union. It came into conflict with the universities over teacher training, and appeared reluctant to discipline members, or to listen to complaints against teachers. Following a highly critical report the College was replaced by the B.C. Teachers’ Council, a body much more tightly controlled by the Ministry of EducationRésumé:Le British Columbia College of Teachers (l’association professionnelle des enseignants de la Colombie Britannique) a existé de 1987 à 2011. Cependant, la Fédération des professeurs de cette province percevait ce regroupement non pas comme une association professionnelle mais plutôt comme un syndicat. Ce fut une période agitée due au nombre de conflits générés par cet organisme. Ainsi, le « College » est entré en conflit avec les universités au sujet de la formation des maîtres, il n'imposait aucune discipline à ses membres et ne tenait pas compte des plaintes formulées contre eux. À la suite d’un rapport très critique à son endroit, le « College » fut remplacé par le B.C. Teachers’ Council, organisme sous le contrôle rigoureux du ministère de l’Éducation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".