MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1489461441

Abstract 19647: The Evolution of Cardiac Output and Cerebral Blood Flow in the Perinatal Transition in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: a Longitudinal Study

2014· article· en· W1489461441 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay Mills, Akiko Hirose, Santokh Dhillon, Étienne Fortin‐Pellerin, Winnie Savard, Po‐Yin Cheung, Deborah Fruitman, Nee Scze Khoo, Lisa K. Hornberger

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypoplastic left heart syndromeCardiologyInternal medicineFetusGestationCardiac outputHemodynamicsPregnancyHeart disease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cardiovascular adaptation through the perinatal transition has not been previously explored in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). We sought to investigate the evolution of cardiac output in HLHS from late gestation through the perinatal period with comparison to healthy fetuses. As fetal HLHS has progressive middle cerebral arterial (MCA) Doppler changes suggestive of brain sparing, we further examined the impact of the transition on MCA blood flow. We hypothesized ductal patency with falling pulmonary vascular resistance after birth in HLHS could lead to cerebral steal. Methods: We prospectively recruited 9 healthy and 11 pregnancies complicated by fetal HLHS. Echocardiograms were performed before birth at ≥37 weeks gestation and after birth at 4-6, 20-24, and 40-48 hours (all newborns), and 3-5 days (HLHS neonates only). Ventricular stroke volumes (SV) were determined using pulse Doppler and semilunar valve diameters, and combined cardiac output (CCO) was calculated (SV x heart rate (HR)). MCA pulsatility index (PI) was determined using the peak systolic, end diastolic and mean velocities. Results: In late gestation, the CCO was similar between groups (HLHS mean 404 ± 91 vs. control 373 ± 96cc/kg/min). After birth, there was a trend towards higher CCO in HLHS at 4-6 and 20-24 hours (p= 0.06), which reached significance at 48 hours (587±155 vs controls 402±73 cc/kg/min, p=0.03). The CCO was highest in HLHS at 3-5 days (672 ± 117cc/kg/min, p Conclusions: HLHS newborns significantly increase their cardiac output in the perinatal transition, particularly from 48 hours onward, through both increased HR and SV. While just prior to birth the MCA PI in HLHS suggests brain sparing, a reverse finding is observed after birth, which could reflect increased CCO and/or cerebral steal. This could be a period of cerebral vulnerability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→