MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1489509015 · doi:10.4271/2000-01-2061

Low Emission Propane-Fueled Lawn and Garden Engines

2000· article· en· W1489509015 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaobo Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsIMPCO Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawnPropaneAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">As emission regulations for off-road engines become more and more stringent, alternative fuel off-road engines are being developed rapidly. This paper studies a closed-loop controlled LPG system, which was developed and tested on four lawn and garden engines.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The four engines studied are Kohler 18hp, Kohler 13 hp, Briggs & Stratton 6 hp, and Briggs & Stratton 5hp engines, which power Toro walk-behind commercial lawn mowers, John Deere lawn tractors, John Deere walk-behind commercial lawn mowers, and Toro walk-behind commercial lawn mowers, respectively. All engines are four-stroke, spark-ignited and air-cooled. The fuel management system is an air valve based closed-loop controlled dedicated LPG system. The emissions and durability test results are presented. It was found that all engines operating on propane had significantly lower exhaust emissions than those of gasoline baselines. Durability tests were conducted on the Kohler 18hp, Kohler 13hp and Briggs & Stratton 6hp engines under the SAE J1088 A cycle for 250, 250, and 500 hours, respectively. The durability tests revealed that all three engines showed no substantial deterioration of emissions or performance.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207