MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490183071 · doi:10.1002/9780470062128.ch13

Genetic Control of Host–Pathogen Interactions in Mice

2006· review· en· W1490183071 on OpenAlexaff
Gundula Min‐Oo, Mary M. Stevenson, Anny Fortin, Philippe Gros

Bibliographic record

VenueNovartis Foundation symposium · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPathogenVirulencePlasmodium chabaudiIntracellular parasiteGeneGeneticsPhenotypeMicrobiologyPlasmodium falciparumImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The onset, progression and outcome of infections are determined by performance of host defence mechanisms and expression of pathogen virulence determinants. Genetic analysis in mouse can identify host genes that play critical roles at the interface of host-pathogen interactions. Genetic effects detected as variations in susceptibility in inbred, recombinant and mutant strains of mice can be mapped as simple traits or quantitative trait loci followed by identification by positional cloning. We have used mouse models of infection with bacterial (Mycobacterium, Legionella) and parasitic pathogens (Plasmodium) to discover genes and proteins that are important for macrophage function against such infectious agents. These studies have identified Nrampl-mediated exclusion of divalent metals from the phagosomal space as a key regulator of intracellular replication of Mycobacteria. Also, intracellular sensing of Legionella by functional Birc1e/Naip5 protein is essential to prevent replication of this bacterium in macrophages. Finally, we have identified two new loci that affect blood-stage replication of Plasmodium chabaudi AS in mice, and have cloned the corresponding genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNovartis Foundation symposiumSame topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207