MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490183380

피터팬(Peter Pan) 신화의 현대적 재생산

2005· article· ko· W1490183380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
손향숙

Bibliographic record

Venue문학과영상 · 2005
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyHoganArtContext (archaeology)EmpireApotheosisCivilizationArt historyHistoryLiteratureSociologyAnthropologyAncient history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children’s literature at the end of the nineteenth century reflects the growing disturbances and doubts as to the civilization built on the pillars of industrial progress and imperial expansion. The Empire and its ideals were questioned, and not surprisingly, childhood was celebrated as a state before growth and development. In this respect, it can be said that Peter Pan’s(1904) success exemplifies the beautification of childhood as a cultural phenomenon in a most intensified form. J. M. Barrie re-wrote the story of Peter Pan in a novel form and the novel Peter and Wendy(1911) should be read as a reaction to and an intervention in the mystification of the child. Barrie demystifies Peter Pan by showing it is the story-telling that confers Peter Pan with eternal childhood and in disclosing what loss that boon entails. Peter and Wendy focuses not on the eternal boy himself, but on the process by which Peter Pan is made into a myth. Peter Pan myth has been recreated throughout the twentieth century. Herbert Brenon’s silent film Peter Pan was the first movie reproduction. Disney’s animation was produced in 1953 and Steven Spielberg’s Hook(1991), Disney’s Return to Neverland(2002), P. J. Hogan’s Peter Pan(2003), Marc Forster’s Finding Neverland(2004), etc, followed it. These films re-create the Peter Pan myth and contribute to keeping it alive. Disney’s Peter Pan(1953) detaches Peter Pan story from the historical context in which it was created and turns it into something ‘universal’. Disney strengthens Wendy’s role as ‘mother’ and changes Barrie’s Neverland into a land of flirtation and jealousy, which makes it easy for Wendy to reconcile herself to the world of Mr Darling. It argues for the necessity of outgrowing childish joy and growing up into the adult world. Hogan’s Peter Pan transforms the story of the eternal boy into a romantic juvenile love story, the Neverland into a space which can be reached with technology. The aura of childhood and magic disappears and is replaced with budding love and science. But still, Peter Pan is celebrated as an eternal child. As far as modern reproductions contribute to keeping Peter Pan myth alive, they belie Barrie’s Peter and Wendy. Peter Pan movies have intensified the mystification of Peter Pan and their glorification of the child innocence has led to eliminating Barrie’s critical insight into the myth itself and justifying conservative adult values including heterosexual love.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue문학과영상Same topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207