MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490442342 · doi:10.1093/fs/knr243

Musset ou la nostalgie libertine <i>Musset ou la nostalgie libertine</i> . By V <scp>alentina</scp> P <scp>onzetto</scp> . (Histoire des idées et critique littéraire, 433). Geneva: Droz, 2007. 402 pp. Pb €62.24.

2011· article· fr· W1490442342 on OpenAlexaff
D. R. Gamble

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the introduction to this discursive dissertation the author suggests her objective is a consideration of ‘le rôle de la tradition libertine dans l’œuvre et la pensée de Musset d'un point de vue global et organique' (p. 16). Following statements by the narrator in the largely autobiographical Confession d'un enfant du siècle, Ponzetto explains that for Musset ‘le libertinage s'identifie tout simplement avec la peinture des mœurs offerte par ces “romans du siècle de Louis XV” que sans doute […] il lisait passionément et considérait “comme autant de catéchismes de libertinage”’ (p. 23). By their inclusion in Musset's personal library, or references to them in his writing, Ponzetto names these books and their authors, and proceeds to investigate the ways in which they inform his own work, establishing parallels between them as she slowly brings us from the public sphere to the uniquely private: from Musset's preferred geographical areas and interior spaces through traits especially distinctive of his characters, and the language and situations by which they are defined, to an examination, in the last chapter, of the relationship between Musset and his reader (Ponzetto herself) based largely on his distinctive narrative voice. While this approach is thorough, it soon seems repetitive, as the same works often recur under the different rubrics, regardless of their literary merit; and it also makes this study more difficult to consult. Although much of this monograph is concerned with Musset's later work, and particularly the nouvelles, there is little explicit reference to chronology, and no explanation as to why his vision of the eighteenth century, correctly described here as ‘un monde où hommes et femmes auraient pu dire et vivre sans contraintes leurs désirs’ (p. 180), should have come to the fore when it did. This is all the more curious as there is one article at least in print that explains when and how Musset came to prefer what he called the ‘siècle à l'humeur badine’ (see my ‘Proverbe et Madrigal: the Eighteenth Century of Alfred de Musset’, in Genres as Repositories of Cultural Memory, ed. by Hendrik van Gorp and Ulla Mussara-Schroeder (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2000), pp. 219–29). No less surprising, given her subject, is Ponzetto's refusal to comment on the authorship of Gamiani, the pornographic novel often ascribed to Musset. For all that, her scholarship can be impressive, and the thesis is well written, with many analyses of interest to specialists: the convincing discussion of the influence of libertine literature on Musset's early verse, for instance, the light her perspective sheds on some of his most memorable works, and her engaging, if at times provocative, remarks (pp. 38, 74, 155, 180, 184, 204, et al.) on the character of the creative imagination that moved the remarkable pen of this wayward ‘romantique né classique’ (Arvède Barine, quoted on p. 336).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicFrench Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207