Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbonate-hosted base metal sulphide deposits are discussed with reference to ore deposit mineralogy and geology, isotope geochemistry, ore fluids and ore genesis of type examples. Three main carbonate-hosted deposit types are recognized: 1. Leadville-type mineralization (LTM); 2. Sedimentary-exhalative (SEDEX); and 3. Mississippi Valley-type (MVT) deposits. The three types constitute a distinct group of deposits characterized by orebodies within carbonate host-rocks containing Pb and Zn as the major metals with variable amounts of Cu and associated by-products, including Ag, Cd, Ge, V, Ga, As, Sb, Au and In. LTM deposits form by magmatic-hydrothermal processes associated with igneous intrusions and correspond to the carbonate-hosted high-enthalpy type of The SEDEX deposits are typically characterized by syngenetic to syndiagenetic processes of mineralization at the submarine surface within sedimentary basins prior to carbonate lithification and are spatially associated with faults located within, or at the margins of, the basins. They are also known as medium-enthalpy, Irish type or clastic dominated Pb-Zn deposits (Hitzman & Beaty, 1996; In contrast, typical MVT deposits (low-enthalpy type of They are commonly referred to as MVT due to the occurrence of classic districts in the Mississippi River drainage basin of the USA Both SEDEX and MVT deposits form from formation waters derived from sedimentary basins with high heat flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it