Critical management studies at work: Negotiating tensions between theory and practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Introduction: Intersections of Critical Management Research and Practice: A Multi-Domain Perspective Maxim Voronov, Julie Wolfram Cox, Tony LeTrent-Jones and David Weir PART I: CRITICAL MANAGEMENT RESEARCH IN ACTION: CHOICE AND CONSTRAINT IN THE GENERATION AND TRANSLATION OF ACTIONABLE KNOWLEDGE 1. Taking the Employee's Perspective: Negotiating Critical Research in an Organization in Conflict Amanda Roan, Rebecca Loudoun and George Lafferty 2. The Phantom Menace: Conducting Practitioner-Informed Research Without Losing Academic Liberties Alexander Styhre 3. Emancipatory Practice and Information Systems Implementation: An Action Research Project in an NHS Acute Trust Teresa Waring 4. Footless and Fancy Free? On Some Means to Move Beyond the Self-induced and Institutional Constraints of CMS Neil Clarke 5. Practical Pushing: Creating Discursive Space in Organizational Narratives Joyce K. Fletcher, Lotte Bailyn and Stacy Blake Beard 6. Discourse and Policy in the Learning and Skills Sector Ron Kerr and Steve Fox PART II: CRITICAL TEACHING AND LEARNING: RESPONSIVENESS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT EDUCATION 7. Muckraking Novels: The Search for Another Paradigm Stephen Sloane 8. Journeys into Critical Thinking: Intersecting Foucault into the Organizational Practice Debate Daniel King 9. Extending the Repertoire of Research Approaches in a Professional Doctoral Program: The Place and Shape of a Critical Perspective Jan Priest and Erica Hallebone 10. Supervising Action Research: A Space for Critical Influence on Organizational Practice Marion Macalpine and Sheila Marsh 11. Paradoxes of Academic Practice: Managerialist Techniques in Critical Pedagogy Torkild Thanem and Louise Wallenberg 12. Experiences of Living and Doing Critical Management Education in Canadian Business Schools Gina Grandy and Jane Gibbon PART III: CRITICAL IDENTITIES: THE CRITICAL TURN IN EVERYDAY DOMAINS OF PRACTICE 13. Caught in 'No-Man's Land'? Consultancy and Critique Brendon Harvey 14. 'I Didn't Have the Balls for It': How a 'Feminine' Discourse of Consulting Opens a Critical Space Sheila Marsh 15. Silences and Disappearing Acts: The Politics of Gendering Organizational Practice Margaret L. Page 16. The Trouble with the Glass Ceiling: Critical Reflections on a Famous Concept Yvonne Benschop and Margo Brouns 17. Racial Inequality in the Workplace: How Critical Management Studies Can Inform Current Approaches Brenda Johnson 18. Critical Social Entrepreneurship - An Alternative Discourse Analysis James Latham, Robert Jones and Michela Betta 19. Power, Control and the Protean Career: A Critical Perspective on Multinational Organizations' Permanent International Assignees Marian Crowley-Henry and David Weir Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.103 | 0.096 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.130 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.057 | 0.050 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.021 |
| Research integrity | 0.015 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".