MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1490647891 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.68

Abstract 68: Safety and Effectiveness of Intensive Blood Pressure Management in the Elderly: Findings From the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes Trial

2014· article· en· W1490647891 on OpenAlexaff
Carole L. White, Jeff M. Szychowski, Pablo Pergola, Helena Lau, Oscar Benavente

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Blood pressureCohortInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialCardiologyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Despite being at greatest risk for stroke, older adults are less likely to receive the same level of vascular risk factor management as younger adults. Our objective was to examine the safety and effectiveness of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) management in the elderly cohort of the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) trial. Methods: SPS3 is an international trial that evaluated SBP targets (< 130 mmHg vs. 130-149 mmHg) for secondary stroke prevention in patients with recent lacunar stroke. Elderly were defined as ≥ 75 years at study entry and compared with patients < 75 years on adherence to SBP targets, presence of side-effects, and risk of recurrent stroke, cardiac events, and death. Interactions between age and SBP targets on outcomes were examined. Results: Of the 3020 participants in SPS3, 494 (16%) were ≥ 75 years (mean age 80 years). Mean achieved SBP across all follow-ups was similar (older and younger groups respectively, lower target: 125.2 (15.8) vs. 125.1 (14.4), p=0.62; higher target: 137.1 (14.6) vs. 137.1 (14.4), p=0.95). Adherence to medications and follow-up visits was similar. There was no difference by age group in rates of postural hypotension and serious complications of hypotension. There was no difference in the effect of the SBP intervention by age group on stroke (p=0.39), cardiac events (p=0.62), and all-cause mortality (p=0.29). There was a significant interaction for vascular death (p=0.049). While there was no association with SBP treatment group and vascular death in the younger group (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.68-2.01), there was a significant reduction in vascular death for the elderly in those assigned to the lower target (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.18-0.98). Conclusions: These results provide evidence that elderly (≥75 years) can safely tolerate lowering of SBP. In addition to similar benefit as their younger counterparts regarding stroke, cardiac events, and all cause mortality, elderly SPS3 participants had a decreased risk of vascular death. To decrease the growing stroke burden it is critical that age disparities in treatment are eliminated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→