MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490875712 · doi:10.1063/1.2902682

DIFFUSION OF PULSED EDDY CURRENTS IN THIN CONDUCTING PLATES

2008· article· en· W1490875712 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEddy currentBrassMaterials scienceElectromagnetic coilElectrical conductorDiffusionConductivityPickupEddy-current testingNuclear magnetic resonanceMagnetic fieldMechanicsCopperOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysicsComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulsed eddy current response from plates of copper, aluminum and brass less than 1 mm in thickness was investigated. Voltage response from the driver/pickup coil configuration was fit with an expression that considers the time‐dependence of the pulse generated first, in air and second, when the probe is mounted on conducting plates. Characteristic times for expulsion out of and diffusion into the conducting volume, by the electromagnetic field, were considered. In the thin plate limit the characteristic time for diffusion within the plate varied linearly with conductivity and had a magnitude that scaled with the dimensions of coil and plate thickness, in agreement with the variation expected for electromagnetic diffusion in thin conducting plates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it