MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490875712 · doi:10.1063/1.2902682

DIFFUSION OF PULSED EDDY CURRENTS IN THIN CONDUCTING PLATES

2008· article· en· W1490875712 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas W. Krause, Catalin Mandache, J. H. V. Lefebvre, Donald O. Thompson, Dale E. Chimenti

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEddy currentBrassMaterials scienceElectromagnetic coilElectrical conductorDiffusionConductivityPickupEddy-current testingNuclear magnetic resonanceMagnetic fieldMechanicsCopperOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysicsComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulsed eddy current response from plates of copper, aluminum and brass less than 1 mm in thickness was investigated. Voltage response from the driver/pickup coil configuration was fit with an expression that considers the time‐dependence of the pulse generated first, in air and second, when the probe is mounted on conducting plates. Characteristic times for expulsion out of and diffusion into the conducting volume, by the electromagnetic field, were considered. In the thin plate limit the characteristic time for diffusion within the plate varied linearly with conductivity and had a magnitude that scaled with the dimensions of coil and plate thickness, in agreement with the variation expected for electromagnetic diffusion in thin conducting plates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207