MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490970791

Noise Mapping of an Educational Environment

2013· article· en· W1490970791 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paulo Henrique Trombetta Zannin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsNoise (video)Noise pollutionAcousticsSoftwareRange (aeronautics)Ambient noise levelEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceRemote sensingGeographySound (geography)EngineeringNoise reductionPhysicsArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to perform computer-assisted noise mapping of an educational environment.The computer simulations were performed using SoundPLAN software.An analysis of the acoustic maps generated by the simulations indicates that contributions to the noise levels found on the campus originate mostly from three streets on campus, as well as from the roads surrounding the outer perimeter -the Green Line and the BR-277 highway.The computergenerated acoustic maps show that the noise levels within the campus exceed the limit of Leq = 50 dB(A) established for educational areas, according to the Brazilian standard for noise assessment in communities.Therefore, the noise maps indicate a critical situation of noise pollution on campus.However, despite this negative and concerning situation of noise pollution, the acoustic maps also reveal several "islands of acoustic tranquility" on campus.These "islands" can be observed adjacent to buildings where sound levels range from 45 to 48 dB(A) and from 48 to 51 dB(A), which are indicated in green tones on the acoustic maps. SOMMAIRELe but de cette étude était de réaliser la cartographie du bruit assistée par ordinateur d'un environnement éducatif.Les simulations informatiques ont été effectuées en utilisant le logiciel SoundPLAN.Une analyse des cartes acoustiques générées par les simulations indiquent que les contributions aux niveaux de bruit mesurés sur le campus proviennent principalement des trois rues sur le campus, ainsi que des routes entourant son périmètre extérieur -la Ligne verte et le BR-277 autoroute.Les cartes générées par ordinateur montrent que les niveaux de bruit à l'intérieur du périmètre du campus de dépassent la limite de Leq = 50 dB (A) établie pour les zones d'éducation, selon à la norme brésilienne de bruit environnemental.Par conséquent, les cartes de bruit indiquent une situation critique de pollution sonore sur le campus.Cependant, malgré ces nuisances sonores, les cartes acoustiques révèlent également plusieurs «îlots de tranquillité acoustique» sur le campus.Ces «îlots» peut être observé près des bâtiments où les niveaux sonores s'établissent entre 45 à 48 dB (A) et entre 48 à 51 dB (A) et qui sont indiqués dans les tons verts sur les cartes acoustiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207