MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1491142713 · doi:10.1002/jcp.24776

PLCβ1a and PLCβ1b Selective Regulation and Cyclin D3 Modulation Reduced by Kinamycin F During K562 Cell Differentiation

2014· article· en· W1491142713 on OpenAlexafffund
Alberto Bavelloni, Gary I. Dmitrienko, Valerie J. Goodfellow, Ahmad Ghavami, Manuela Piazzi, William L. Blalock, Francesca Chiarini, Lucio Cocco, Irene Faenza

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Physiology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsK562 cellsInducerCyclinCell biologyCyclin D3BiologyErythropoiesisCell cycleCellMolecular biologyChemistryBiochemistryGeneInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here we report that both PLCβ1a and PLCβ1b are relevant regulators of erythropoiesis in that kinamycin F, a potent inducer of γ-globin production in K562 cells, caused a selectively reduction of both PLCβ1 isozymes even though the results point out that the effect of the drug is mainly directed toward the expression of the PLCβ1a isoform. We have identified a different role for the two isozymes as regulators of K562 differentiation process induced by kinamycin F. The overexpression of PLCβ1b induced an increase in γ-globin expression even in the absence of kinamycin F. Moreover during K562 differentiation, cyclin D3 level is regulated by PLCβ1 signaling pathway. Namely the amplification of the expression of the PLCβ1a, but not of PLCβ1b, is able to maintain high levels of expression of cyclin D3 even after treatment with kinamycin F. This could be due to their different distribution in the cell compartments since the amount of PLCβ1b is mainly present in the nucleus in respect to PLCβ1a. Our data indicate that the amplification of PLCβ1a expression, following treatment with kinamycin F, confers a real advantage to K562 cells viability and protects cells themselves from apoptosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular PhysiologySame topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207