MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Dexmedetomidine reduced astrocyte connexin 43 and attenuated neuropathic pain induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation in rats (LB503)

2014· article· en· W1491210775 on OpenAlexaff
lingzhi Wang, Huansen Huang, Weiyi Xia, Yanbing He, Chi‐Wai Cheung, Zhengyuan Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropathic painNociceptionSciatic nerveAstrocyteHyperalgesiaConnexinAllodyniaAnesthesiaMedicineSpinal cordPeripheral nerve injuryPharmacologyNeuroscienceChemistryInternal medicineGap junctionBiologyCentral nervous systemReceptorIntracellular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dexmedetomidine(DEX) has been shown to attenuate neuropathic pain (NP), but the mechanism is unclear. Astrocytes connexin 43(Cx43) is increased in subjects with NP and plays an important role in the development and maintenance of NP (Glia. 2012;60(11):1660‐70). We thus investigated the role of astroglia Cx43 in DEX‐induced anti‐nociceptive effects in rats with NP. Peripheral NP was induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation (PSNL) in SD rats. After 10 days of inducing NP, DEX was intrathecally administrated for 5 days and ipsilateral mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia were examined by Von Frey Test and Hargreaves Test. Compared with control rats, PSNL induced significant ipsilateral mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia (P<0.05) that were coincident with enhanced Cx43 and increased astroglia activation in ipsilateral lumbosacral dorsal spinal cord. DEX inhibited astroglia Cx43 expression and attenuated NP (P<0.05 vs. control). Cx43 gene knock‐down did not significantly further enhance DEX mediated attenuation of NP. We concluded that astroglia Cx43 plays a critical role in DEX mediated anti‐nociceptive effects in rats with NP. Grant Funding Source : Supported by Departmental development fund Supported by Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province(2010B060900089). The authors are grateful to Pro.Huang for critical design and revise . huanghs5480@163.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPain Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→