A Remidiação de Sininho: explorando os fundamentos de transmídia em um sistema narrativo secular
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A trajetoria de 100 anos da travessa personagem Sininho, desde a peca “Peter Pan”, de J. M. Barrie, de 1904, ate a atual franchise Disney Fadas, e uma metanarrativa de adaptacao e remidiacao atraves da qual a midia e a “infância” podem ser vistas como forcas que se inter-relacionam. Com foco na midia e nas narrativas infantis contemporâneas, este artigo analisa as encarnacoes de uma franchise da midia, em intervalos de 50 anos. O procedimento close de leitura nos ofereceu novas formas de perceber a relacao reflexiva entre as construcoes sociais da infância, a evolucao da narrativa na literatura infantil e o desenvolvimento da midia para o publico infantil, desde o periodo eduardiano. Usando a Sininho como exemplo de um fenomeno, descobrimos que, a medida que evoluem a narrativa e a midia infantis, de forma a aumentar o potencial da agencia da infância, as formulacoes comerciais estrategicamente moldam essa agencia, atraves da estruturacao do acesso e da participacao.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".