"In the Women's Sportlight": une etude des chroniques sportives de Myrtle Cook dans le Montreal Daily Star, 1929-1930
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article A©tudie les chroniques sportives de la mA©daillA©e olympique Myrtle Cook et, plus spA©cifiquement, celles parues entre les mois dA¢â¬â¢avril 1929 et de mars 1930 dans le Montreal Star. Plus quA¢â¬â¢un simple compte-rendu descriptif de lA¢â¬â¢actualitA© sportive, les chroniques servent de plate-forme A Cook pour favoriser le dA©veloppement des sports fA©minins A MontrA©al, comme ailleurs au Canada et dans le monde. En tant que sportive de haut niveau, elle encourage les femmes A prendre part A des compA©titions. Ce faisant, elle sA¢â¬â¢oppose au discours des experts qui cherchent A circonscrire lA¢â¬â¢accA¨s des femmes A celles-ci. Elle conteste alors le concept de A¢â¬Enature fA©minineA¢â¬â¢ qui fonde leur discours, de mAÂame que lA¢â¬â¢organisation de la sociA©tA© industrielle. Remettant en question la suprA©matie physique et sociale des hommes, son discours peut AÂatre considA©rA© comme lA¢â¬â¢un des plus contestataires de son A©poque, car Cook est lA¢â¬â¢une des rares femmes A questionner la hiA©rarchie qui dA©coule des rapports de genre tels quA¢â¬â¢ils sont construits au QuA©bec, comme ailleurs au Canada, A la fin des annA©es 1920.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".