MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1491718385

Healthy Learners in Schools Program: New Brunswick's Comprehensive School Health Approach

2012· article· en· W1491718385 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julie A. Bertrand, Audrey R. Giles

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchool healthPedagogyHealth promotionMedical educationPsychologyPolitical scienceLibrary scienceHumanitiesPublic healthNursingMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

0 0 1 346 1977 University of Manitoba 16 4 2319 14.0 96 800x600 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE The purpose of this study was to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors of the implementation of the Healthy Learners in Schools Program (HLSP) - a Comprehensive School Health approach - in two Elementary schools in New Brunswick, Canada. Four teachers and two principals participated in semi-structured interviews to discuss the HSLP. Factors identified included: lack of knowledge pertaining to the HLSP; environmental factors; support from the administration, school community and student’ families; teachers’ and principals’ individual attributes; and organizational factors. Health promotion in schools needs to become a priority for programs such as the HLSP to become apparent and consciously implemented in schools and for school staff and members of the school community to be aware of its existence. Support from parents, colleagues, and the administration along with health promotion policies are strongly recommended to assist the implementation of a Comprehensive School Health approach in these two New Brunswick schools. Cette etude cherchait a cerner les facteurs qui favorisent ou defavorisent la mise en œuvre du programme Apprenants en sante a l’ecole (ASE) : Approche globale de la sante en milieu scolaire, dans deux ecoles elementaires du Nouveau-Brunswick, au Canada. Quatre membres du personnel enseignant et deux directions d’ecole ont participe a des entrevues semi-dirigees dans le but de discuter des ASE. Plusieurs facteurs sont ressortis de ces discussions, y compris le manque de connaissances au sujet du programme ASE; les facteurs environnementaux; l’appui de l’administration, de la communaute scolaire et des familles des eleves; les qualites particulieres du directeur ou de la directrice de l’ecole; ainsi que divers facteurs organisationnels. La promotion de la sante dans les ecoles doit figurer parmi les priorites de programmes comme ASE pour etre prise en compte et integralement mise en œuvre dans les ecoles, et pour que le personnel et les membres de l’ecole s’engagent pleinement en ce sens. Il est fortement recommande d’obtenir l’appui des parents, des collegues et des gestionnaires, et de se doter de politiques de promotion de la sante pour faciliter l’adoption d’une approche globale de la sante en milieu scolaire dans ces deux ecoles du Nouveau-Brunswick

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue phénEPS / PHEnex JournalSame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207