MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1491909362

Adapting Federalism: Indigenous Peoples and Multilevel Governance in Canada and the United States

2009· article· en· W1491909362 on OpenAlexaffabout
Martín Papillon

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFederalismPolityIndigenousPolitical scienceMultinational corporationCorporate governancePolitical economyPublic administrationPoliticsSociologyLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A significant body of literature has recently emerged on federalism in culturally and ethnically diverse societies. In addition to theory driven work on institutional design in multinational federations, recent empirical analyses have focused on the impact of ethno-linguistic diversity on the working and evolution of federations. These analyses point to the relative plasticity of federal systems in adapting to the social fabric of a polity, thus ensuring both the stability of the federal union and its capacity to adapt to the ongoing tensions created by ethnic and linguistic divisions. They also provide an important insight into how multinational federations evolve by inviting us to shift our focus away from the “high politics” of constitutional design and pay more attention to the policy process as a space where institutional patterns are redefined and adapted to reflect ethno-linguistic divides in federations. Like most of the literature on federalism in multinational societies however, authors working on policy-level change assume national minorities have some degree of control over at least one of the constituent units of the federation. What happens in cases where territorially defined minorities do not control the institutions of one of the federated units? Indigenous peoples in Canada and the United States are a classic case of small, territorially defined, minorities who were excluded from the original federal compact of both countries. Can federalism adapt to Indigenous claims? If so, how? Building on theories of path dependent institutional change, I suggest federalism in Canada and the United States has evolved in light of Indigenous autonomy demands. This evolution, however, is largely taking place at the margin of the federal system, through processes of governance that are layered over, and often in tension with, the formal division of powers and intergovernmental regimes that characterize Canadian and American federalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0260.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic Journal→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→