Policy Statement on Recontacting Artificially Inseminated Patients: Scientific and Ethical Foundations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sexually transmitted diseases can be passed not only through unprotected sexual intercourse, but also through artificial insemination with a contaminated semen sample.Taking into account the possibility of transmission of diseases from questionable semen samples, Health Canada decided in 1996 to regulate semen donor selection and the use of donated sperm samples.Regulations included a questionnaire to identify individuals at high risk for sexually transmitted diseases and serological and semen screenings for various pathogens before artificial insemination.Several sperm banks in Canada did not comply with the Health Canada regulatory requirements in certain procedures (Health Canada, 2000).Some did not screen for human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV-I/II); others did not test semen samples for hepatitis B or C. To minimize the risk of transmission of infectious agents, these sperm banks have been prohibited from inseminating patients, and the embargo will be lifted only after the requirements of the Semen Regulations are satisfied.Additionally, as a precautionary measure, Health Canada strongly recommended notification and testing of all patients who were artificially inseminated with untested or partially tested semen:All recipients of donor semen should be tested as there are reasonable grounds to believe that they may have been at an increased risk of contracting one or more of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".