MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1492136410

Neisseria meningitidis carriage by age: a systematic review

2008· review· en· W1492136410 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hannah Christensen, Caroline Trotter, Leah Bowen, Matthew Hickman

Bibliographic record

VenueBristol Research (University of Bristol) · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeisseria meningitidisCarriageMedicineMicrobiologyVirologyBiologyBacteriaGeneticsPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Whilst the introduction of meningococcal serogroup C vaccine in 1999 has successfully reduced the number of cases of disease caused by this serogroup, meningococcal disease remains an important public health problem in the UK. Most cases of meningococcal disease in the UK are now caused by serogroup B and a number of promising vaccine candidates are in clinical trial. Infectious disease models can be used as tools to help identify the optimal introduction strategy for new vaccines. Due to the epidemiology of meningococcal meningitis, such models must take account of the transmission dynamics of the organism and require information on carriage by age. However, few recent large-scale carriage studies in all age groups have been undertaken in the UK due to logistic and cost reasons. The purpose of this systematic review was to obtain more robust estimates of carriage by age, which could be used within a transmission dynamic model of meningococcal disease. Methods: The databases EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for papers reporting carriage of Neisseria meningitidis in defined age groups. Papers published after 1969 reporting on at least 100 individuals sampled/swabbed for meningococcal carriage in any language were included. Papers reporting studies from Africa, Asia and Russia , China and Japan were excluded due to thebecause the epidemiology of meningococcal disease is different epidemiology of meningococcal infection in these countries compared to the UK (e.g. i.e. predominance of large proportion of group A disease). Studies in among close contacts of a cases or in military personnel (with the exception of those sampled on day of entry) were also excluded. References of relevant and review papers were checked for additional studies. Results: After removing duplicates the search returned 1464 papers; after reviewing titles and abstracts, the full text was obtained for 242 papers. At the time of writing a number of foreign text papers were still being processed; the preliminary results presented here are for papers in English (n=177) identified in the initial search. Full results, including point estimates of carriage by age will be available for conference. [Will need to be changed] 40 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria reporting studies from 18 countries: Australia (1), Belgium (1), Canada (2), the Czech Republic (1), Denmark (2), Germany (1), Greece (4), Israel (1), Lebanon (1), the Netherlands (2), Norway (3), Poland (1), Saudi Arabia (1), Spain (3), Thailand (1), Turkey (1), the UK (12) and USA (2). There were 5 longitudinal studies and 29 papers providing carriage prevalence for more than one age or age range. Whilst there are large differences in carriage by age reported by individual studies, a general trend of low carriage prevalence in young children and older adults and increased carriage in teenagers and young adults can be seen (figure 1). Conclusion: Robust estimates of carriage prevalence by age are required to parameterise transmission dynamic models of meningococcal meningitis, which can inform vaccination schedule development. In the absence of a recent large-scale carriage study across all age groups in the UK, this systematic review provides estimates of carriage by age, which can be used for infectious disease modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBristol Research (University of Bristol)Same topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207