MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1492315926 · doi:10.1029/2006gb002889

Potential glacial‐interglacial changes in stable carbon isotope ratios of methane sources and sink fractionation

2008· article· en· W1492315926 on OpenAlexaff
Hinrich Schaefer, Michael J. Whiticar

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLast Glacial MaximumSink (geography)Atmospheric methaneFractionationIce coreIsotopes of carbonEnvironmental scienceIsotope fractionationHoloceneMethaneInterglacialStable isotope ratioEnvironmental chemistryGlacial periodCarbon cycleWetlandRadiocarbon datingAtmospheric sciencesGreenhouse gasChemistryGeologyClimatologyOceanographyEcologyTotal organic carbonPaleontologyEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Past atmospheric methane emissions can be constrained by δ 13 CH 4 records from ice cores only if changes to source δ 13 CH 4 signatures and sink isotope effects with varying environmental and climatic conditions are accurately known. We present reconstructions of such changes based on paleodata and recent systems observations. The results are specific for budget scenarios and are reported here for two alternative types of budgets, one including aerobic methane emissions (AMP) from plants and the other type without AMP. Shifting atmospheric δ 13 CO 2 potentially led to 13 CH 4 enrichment by 0.8‰ in the preindustrial Holocene (PIH) (∼150–11,000 years (a) B.P.) and ∼0.3–0.6‰ at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (∼18,000 a B.P.) relative to today. Differing distribution of C 3 and C 4 plant precursor material may account for 13 CH 4 enrichment of ∼0.4‰ (PIH) and ∼0.6–1.1‰ (LGM). Temperature‐dependent fractionation and varying methanogenic pathways in wetlands may lead to atmospheric 13 CH 4 depletion by ∼0.1–1.2‰. Sink fractionation today (7.4‰) is higher than during the PIH (∼7.0‰) and the LGM (∼5.7‰). The cumulative effect of all processes is ∼0.8‰ 13 CH 4 enrichment in the PIH and ∼1–1.2‰ 13 CH 4 depletion at the LGM. Budget reconstructions will be inaccurate if these changes are not included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biogeochemical CyclesSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207