Fiscal federalism and political decentralization : lessons from Spain, Germany and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents:PrefaceNuria Bosch and Jose M DuranINTRODUCTION1. The Financing System of Spanish Regions: Main Features, Weak Points and Possible ReformsNuria Bosch and Jose M DuranPART I: TAX ASSIGNMENT2. Revenue Assignments in the Practice of Fiscal DecentralizationJorge Martinez-Vazquez3. Tax Assignment and Tax Autonomy in OECD CountriesHansjorg Blochliger4. Tax Assignment and Regional Co-responsibility in SpainJuan A. Gimeno UllastresPART II: FISCAL EQUALIZATION5. Fiscal Equalization: The Canadian ExperienceRobin Boadway6. Fiscal Equalization in GermanyThiess Buettner7. Fiscal Equalization in Spain Jesus Ruiz-Huerta Carbonell and Ana Herrero AlcaldePART III: TAX ADMINISTRATION8. Tax Coordination under the Canadian Tax SystemPaul Berg-Dick, Michel Carreau, Deanne Field and Mireille Ethier9. The Decentralisation of Tax Administration in Germany: ConsequencesAlexander Ulbricht10. Current Situation and Proposals for Reform of Spain's Tax AdministrationAlejandro Esteller MoreIndex
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".