MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1492524924

They Called Me Mayer July: Painted Memories of a Jewish Childhood in Poland Before the Holocaust (Kirshenblatt and Kirshenblatt-Gimblett)

2008· article· en· W1492524924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeffrey Veidlinger

Bibliographic record

VenueMuseum Anthropology Review (Indiana University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPolish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe HolocaustMemoirJudaismPaintingArt historyNewspaperEmigrationHistoryArtVisual artsSociologyMedia studiesLawArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

They Called Me Mayer July: Painted Memories of a Jewish Childhood in Poland Before the Holocaust is a stunning and gripping volume.The book is difficult to categorize: part art book, part memoir, part ethnography, part history; it defies and transcends conventional genres.It promises to stimulate attention across a wide array of interests and demographics.Some will flip through the book, admiring Mayer Kirshenblatt's evocative paintings of Jewish life in interwar Poland.Others will study his meticulous instructions on subjects ranging from how to harness a horse to how to make a dreydl.Still others will peruse the author's recollections of his early education in Apt, or of his emigration by steamship to Canada.My four-year old daughter, whose readings I never thought I would be referencing in an academic book review, loved the painting "Boy with Herring" and marveled at the idea of carrying home a fish wrapped in newspaper with brine dripping from the head and tail.Two generations removed, my parents both picked up the book and read it cover to cover during their week-long visit a few weeks ago.I can think of few books that could garner this much attention from such diverse readerships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuseum Anthropology Review (Indiana University)Same topicPolish-Jewish Holocaust Memory StudiesFrench-language works237,207