Paving The Way To Environmentally Friendly Pavements Through Innovative Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of placing and compacting hot mix asphalt at lower temperatures provides many benefits to the environment. Lower temperatures can result in several construction-related and performance benefits as well, including reduced aging of the asphalt binder, reduced fumes and odours, reduced tenderness of the mix during compaction, increased usage of recycled asphalt pavement, and reduced drain-down with coarse mixes. The Kyoto Accord protocols, as well as new environmental regulations that are coming into effect mean that pressure is mounting to reduce greenhouse gases. In fact, several Canadian cities are moving towards the implementation of smog days relating to paving and road resurfacing. The use of lower temperatures in the production of hot mix is one way of accommodating this reduction. However, it is also important that this associated reduction does not adversely compromise the long-term quality of the road mixes. This paper describes a partnership between McAsphalt Industries, Miller Paving Limited, and the University of Waterloo's Centre for Pavement and Transportation Technology. It discusses the laboratory and field results of innovative warm mix trials placed in Canada in 2005. The trials to date have shown environmental benefits associated with the warm mix technology without compromising structural performance. For the covering abstract of this conference, see ITRD number E215112. (A)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".