Bibliographic record
Abstract
Self is a crucial concept in modern Chinese literature of the May-Fourth period. It is seen as a principal marker that sets the new literature fundamentally apart from the collective discourse of traditional Chinese literature. In fact, the May-Fourth literature centrally revolves around the concept of and its literary depiction. The new stands for the assertion of the individual, the private, against a cultural heritage that emphasizes conformity to tradition and to the public. Such a new trend is also particularly seen as reflecting the impact of Western literature, leading to an idea of the that implies also a contrast between traditional Chinese culture (lack of and repression of self) and Western literature (valorization of self). Thus the May-Fourth self is very much a site reflecting the conflicts between forces of nativity or isolation, and forces of a West-oriented cosmopolitanism or openness. The new concern with the comes as part of a flood of new, West-informed ideas as a result of China's exposure to the outside world. Since the legacy of the traditional discourse is still heavily present, the modern in its literary presentation is mostly seen in images of dislocation and alienation and antagonism, reflecting the selfs efforts to break from the dominant collective discourse. Writers like Lu Xun see the whole history of Chinese culture as a chronicle of the negation of the and the negligence of subjectivity (Li 234). To some, this negation is even attributable to China's backwardness and her victimization by superior Western powers. Thus in the May-Fourth era, the idea of has taken on more than literary or cultural or cognitive significance. The heavily political dimension, the idea that advocacy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".