Effect of Low Reynolds Number Mixed Convection on the Flow Development Inside Channel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of low Reynolds number channel flow during mixed convection has been investigated experimentally. The measurements were taken at five different locations along the heating section of the channel. The experiments were conducted at bottom wall temperatures of 35, 45 and 55 °C at a flow rate of 0.0315 kg/s (corresponding to the unheated Reynolds number of 450). Grashof number ranged from 9.8 × 106 to 3.9 × 107. The results showed that the buoyancy-driven secondary flow was generated right from the upstream tip of the channel heated section and was enhanced in the downstream direction. Accordingly, turbulence was generated and enhanced in the same direction. The mean streamwise velocity accelerated in the region close to the bottom heated wall in the downstream direction and the rate of acceleration increased with an increase in the bottom wall temperature. The turbulent streamwise and vertical velocities approximately reached close to the development state near the end of the channel heated section for the lowest bottom wall temperature while at the higher two bottom wall temperatures, the turbulent velocities were found to progress along the channel heated section.Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".