The Transylvanian basin, transfer zone between coeval extending and contracting regions: Inferences on the relative importance of slab pull and rift push in arc–back arc systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Structural analysis and paleostress fault slip inversion of the Transylvanian basin and its border regions with the surrounding East and South Carpathians and the Pannonian basin (e.g., the Apuseni Mountains) reveal at least two distinct tectonic phases for the Neogene evolution for the eastern part of the Pannonian basin system. Our main focus is on the role of the Transylvanian basin and its border regions in the Neogene as a transition zone between the extending Pannonian basin and the converging East and South Carpathians. The results provide constraints on the mechanisms responsible for as well the formation of the Transylvanian basin itself as on the relation between the basin‐formational processes operating in the Pannonian basin and the contractional history of the East and South Carpathian mountain belt. In the middle Miocene (17–14/12 Myr) the Transylvanian basin underwent E‐W extension coeval with the first and major phase of overall E‐W extension affecting the Pannonian basin and with submarine accretionary wedge tectonics in the East Carpathian arc. In the late Miocene to early Pliocene (12–8/6 Myr) the Transylvanian basin experienced a strong pulse of E‐W oriented shortening coeval with the climax of compression in the East Carpathians and a second rift phase affecting the Pannonian basin. Continued contractional deformation affected the Transylvanian basin during the Pliocene and Pleistocene with compression directions shifting to ESE‐WNW directions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it