MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1492924402 · doi:10.1029/2001tc900026

The Transylvanian basin, transfer zone between coeval extending and contracting regions: Inferences on the relative importance of slab pull and rift push in arc–back arc systems

2002· article· en· W1492924402 on OpenAlexaff
Ritske S. Huismans, Giovanni Bertotti

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Formations and Processes Exploration
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyNeogeneStructural basinPaleontologyTectonicsRiftInversion (geology)Late MioceneSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural analysis and paleostress fault slip inversion of the Transylvanian basin and its border regions with the surrounding East and South Carpathians and the Pannonian basin (e.g., the Apuseni Mountains) reveal at least two distinct tectonic phases for the Neogene evolution for the eastern part of the Pannonian basin system. Our main focus is on the role of the Transylvanian basin and its border regions in the Neogene as a transition zone between the extending Pannonian basin and the converging East and South Carpathians. The results provide constraints on the mechanisms responsible for as well the formation of the Transylvanian basin itself as on the relation between the basin‐formational processes operating in the Pannonian basin and the contractional history of the East and South Carpathian mountain belt. In the middle Miocene (17–14/12 Myr) the Transylvanian basin underwent E‐W extension coeval with the first and major phase of overall E‐W extension affecting the Pannonian basin and with submarine accretionary wedge tectonics in the East Carpathian arc. In the late Miocene to early Pliocene (12–8/6 Myr) the Transylvanian basin experienced a strong pulse of E‐W oriented shortening coeval with the climax of compression in the East Carpathians and a second rift phase affecting the Pannonian basin. Continued contractional deformation affected the Transylvanian basin during the Pliocene and Pleistocene with compression directions shifting to ESE‐WNW directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectonicsSame topicGeological Formations and Processes ExplorationFrench-language works237,207