Therapeutic hypothermia in acute liver failure: A multicenter retrospective cohort analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The benefit of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) in acute liver failure (ALF) has not been previously demonstrated in a controlled fashion. This study sought to determine the impact of TH on 21-day survival and complications in ALF patients at high risk for cerebral edema. This was a retrospective cohort study of ALF patients in the US Acute Liver Failure Study Group with grade III or IV hepatic encephalopathy. TH (32°C-35°C) was used in 97 patients (8%); 1135 (92%) who were not cooled were controls. Intracranial pressure was monitored in 38 TH ALF patients (39.2% versus 22% of controls, P < 0.001). Rates of bleeding (12% for both) and bloodstream (17% versus 18%) and tracheal infections (21% versus 23%, P > 0.5 for all) were similar. Unadjusted 21-day overall (62% versus 60%) and transplant-free survival rates (45% versus 39%, P > 0.4 for both) were similar. Multivariate models were created for acetaminophen (APAP) patients (n = 582) and non-APAP patients (n = 613). For APAP patients, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD; odds ratio (OR) = 0.91 per increment, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.89-0.94, P < 0.001] and vasopressors (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.11-0.24, P < 0.001) were associated with decreased 21-day spontaneous survival. Survival was improved with TH in APAP patients who were <25 years old (age of 25 years: OR = 2.735, 95% CI = 1.001-7.467) but worsened for APAP patients who were 64 years old or older (age of 64 years: OR = 0.167, 95% CI = 0.028-0.999). For non-APAP patients, MELD (OR = 0.93 per increment, 95% CI = 0.91-0.95, P < 0.001) and vasopressors (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.40-0.90, P = 0.01) were associated with worse outcomes, whereas TH had no impact (P = 0.93). In conclusion, TH in ALF was not associated with increased bleeding or infections. Although young APAP ALF patients may benefit, TH did not consistently affect 21-day survival. A prospective trial is required to clarify the utility of TH in ALF patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".