MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1493430415 · doi:10.1002/lt.24021

Therapeutic hypothermia in acute liver failure: A multicenter retrospective cohort analysis

2014· article· en· W1493430415 on OpenAlexaff
Constantine Karvellas, R. Todd Stravitz, Holly Battenhouse, William M. Lee, Michael L. Schilsky

Bibliographic record

VenueLiver Transplantation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineLiver transplantationAcetaminophenOdds ratioHepatic encephalopathyGastroenterologyRetrospective cohort studyConfidence intervalLiver diseaseSurgeryAnesthesiaTransplantationCirrhosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The benefit of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) in acute liver failure (ALF) has not been previously demonstrated in a controlled fashion. This study sought to determine the impact of TH on 21-day survival and complications in ALF patients at high risk for cerebral edema. This was a retrospective cohort study of ALF patients in the US Acute Liver Failure Study Group with grade III or IV hepatic encephalopathy. TH (32°C-35°C) was used in 97 patients (8%); 1135 (92%) who were not cooled were controls. Intracranial pressure was monitored in 38 TH ALF patients (39.2% versus 22% of controls, P < 0.001). Rates of bleeding (12% for both) and bloodstream (17% versus 18%) and tracheal infections (21% versus 23%, P > 0.5 for all) were similar. Unadjusted 21-day overall (62% versus 60%) and transplant-free survival rates (45% versus 39%, P > 0.4 for both) were similar. Multivariate models were created for acetaminophen (APAP) patients (n = 582) and non-APAP patients (n = 613). For APAP patients, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD; odds ratio (OR) = 0.91 per increment, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.89-0.94, P < 0.001] and vasopressors (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.11-0.24, P < 0.001) were associated with decreased 21-day spontaneous survival. Survival was improved with TH in APAP patients who were <25 years old (age of 25 years: OR = 2.735, 95% CI = 1.001-7.467) but worsened for APAP patients who were 64 years old or older (age of 64 years: OR = 0.167, 95% CI = 0.028-0.999). For non-APAP patients, MELD (OR = 0.93 per increment, 95% CI = 0.91-0.95, P < 0.001) and vasopressors (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.40-0.90, P = 0.01) were associated with worse outcomes, whereas TH had no impact (P = 0.93). In conclusion, TH in ALF was not associated with increased bleeding or infections. Although young APAP ALF patients may benefit, TH did not consistently affect 21-day survival. A prospective trial is required to clarify the utility of TH in ALF patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLiver TransplantationSame topicLiver Disease and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207