MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1493620650 · doi:10.5751/ace-00472-060201

Nest Survival of American Coots Relative to Grazing, Burning, and Water Depths

2011· article· en· W1493620650 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jane E. Austin, Deborah A. Buhl

Bibliographic record

VenueAvian Conservation and Ecology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Geological SurveyU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
KeywordsGrazingNest (protein structural motif)EcologyEnvironmental scienceGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water and emergent vegetation are key features influencing nest site selection and success for many marsh-nesting waterbirds.Wetland management practices such as grazing, burning, and waterlevel manipulations directly affect these features and can influence nest survival.We used model selection and before-after-control-impact approaches to evaluate the effects of water depth and four common landmanagement practices or treatments, i.e., summer grazing, fall grazing, fall burning, and idle (no active treatment) on nest survival of American coots (Fulica americana) nesting at Grays Lake, a large montane wetland in southeast Idaho.The best model included the variables year × treatment, and quadratic functions of date, water depth, and nest age; height of vegetation at the nest did not improve the best model.However, results from the before-after-control-impact analysis indicate that management practices affected nest success via vegetation and involved interactions of hydrology, residual vegetation, and habitat composition.Nest success in idled fields changed little between pre-and post-treatment periods, whereas nest success declined in fields that were grazed or burned, with the most dramatic declines the year following treatments.The importance of water depth may be amplified in this wetland system because of rapid water-level withdrawal during the nesting season.Water and land-use values for area ranchers, management for nesting waterbirds, and long-term wetland function are important considerations in management of water levels and vegetation. 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Avian Conservation and Ecology 6(2): 1 http://www.ace-eco.org/vol6/iss2/art1/pour les propriétaires de ranch de la région, l'aménagement de l'habitat pour les oiseaux aquatiques nicheurs et le fonctionnement à long terme des milieux humides représentent des éléments essentiels à considérer dans la gestion des niveaux d'eau et de la végétation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAvian Conservation and EcologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207