MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1493792616 · doi:10.3138/tric.22.1.72

A Checklist of Books By and About Canadian Artists in The Performing Arts / Un Répertoire de Publications Sur ou Par les Artistes Canadians Dans les Arts Scenique

2001· article· en· W1493792616 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
David S. Gardner

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsChecklistCasualPerforming artsConversationArtVisual artsDramaPerformance artArt historyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This ‘checklist' of 248 books emerged out of a casual conversation with Martha Henry, while we were working together in 1998 on a production of The Crucible for the Manitoba Theatre Centre. Martha decried the paucity of books about Canadian performing artists, while I countered that we were now producing more and more every year. People, rather than theatres or analytic studies of drama, are the main focus of the checklist. I realize, as well, that there are several doubtful titles (books on Boris Karloff, Tyrone Guthrie and Henry Miller, for example), and purely theatrical readers may chafe at the inclusion of musicians, dancers, skaters, and bandleaders, but I was interested in documenting as many entertainment personalities as possible with viable Canadian connections. A section on unpublished works-in-progress is also included. There are bound to be errors and omissions in this preliminary (and primarily English) catalogue, and I would welcome corrections and/or additions at my e-mail address:david.gardner@utoronto.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0280.052
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in CanadaSame topicTheater, Performance, and Music HistoryFrench-language works237,207