MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1493973864

MODELING AND SENSITIVITY/UNCERTAINTY ANALYSES OF ZED-2 BENCHMARK EXPERIMENTS USING DRAGON, DONJON & SUSD3D

2011· dissertation· en· W1493973864 on OpenAlexfundno aff
S. Dabiran

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Sensitivity (control systems)EconometricsComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsGeographyCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the strong interest in thorium fuels in CANDU reactors rooting back to 1970’s and 1980’s, four experiments were done in the ZED-2 critical facility at Chalk River Laboratories to test the properties of (Th,Pu)O­<sub>2</sub> fuel. The fuel was placed in five bundles with a typical CANDU design, stacked vertically in the center of the core (K0 site) and surrounded by natural uranium fuel. The simulation of these experiments using the transport code DRAGON coupled with the diffusion code DONJON is presented. DRAGON is initially used to model two lattices and the full cores in 2D. These models are designed to calculate direct/adjoint flux, k<sub>∞</sub> and k<sub>eff</sub> values using the collision probability method. Furthermore, the models determine a set of homogenized and condensed cross sections in two energy groups. Subsequently, DONJON is used to model the full core facility in three dimensions. Using the homogenized and condensed macroscopic cross section libraries obtained from the DRAGON models, DONJON is able to calculate the flux alongside with the k<sub>eff</sub> values for the specific cases in two energy groups. The results are then compared to those from the experiments and will further validate the accuracy of the simulations. Sensitivity and uncertainty results for the infinite lattices and the 2D full core model using DRAGON and SUSD3D code are discussed. The direct and adjoint flux values determined by DRAGON for the lattices and the full core model are used by SUSD3D to calculate the sensitivity profiles for specific reactions of the isotopes present. The sensitivity profiles are then used alongside with the covariance matrices to calculate the uncertainty contribution of nuclear data to criticality. The sensitivity and uncertainty (S/U) results of the 2D model for full core, using the DRAGON/SUSD3D code coupling are then compared with the S/U results of a 3D model of the full core using the code TSUNAMI within the SCALE6 package in reference. The comparisons will show an excellent degree of consistency between the two methods, while reasons for possible differences in the results are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207