Autonomic Dysreflexia and Primary Afferent Sprouting after Clip-Compression Injury of the Rat Spinal Cord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spinal cord injury leads to many forms of autonomic dysfunction including autonomic dysreflexia, a condition involving recurrent episodes of paroxysmal hypertension and associated bradycardia. This hypertension may reach intensities that are life-threatening. We investigated autonomic dysreflexia and the sprouting of central processes of primary afferent neurons (a potential mechanism for autonomic dysreflexia) in a clinically-relevant calibrated clip-compression model of spinal cord injury in the rat. Autonomic dysreflexia was induced by colon distension in the conscious rats 2 weeks after severe (50-g) clip compression injury of the spinal cord at the 4th thoracic segment. The central arbor of small-diameter primary afferent fibers in laminae III-VII of the spinal cord dorsal horn was also assessed at 2 weeks after cord injury by quantitative morphometry, using calcitonin gene-related peptide as a marker. In response to colon distension, arterial pressure increased by 41 +/- 3 mmHg from a resting value of 109 +/- 4 mmHg, and heart rate decreased by 124 +/- 13 beats/min from a value of 515 +/- 16 beats/min (n = 7). Minimal locomotor function was recovered by these rats: by 2 weeks after injury they attained scores of only 3.1 +/- 1.3 on the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan scale. Histopathology of the clip-compression lesion site in the cord consisted of extensive central necrosis extending several segments rostral and caudal to the lesion. Quantitative measures of the small-diameter afferent arbors revealed significant increases in area ranging from 20-27% in thoracolumbar segments caudal to the injury (n = 5) in comparison to sham-injured rats (n = 6). A second study was done to assess the impact of severity of injury on the relationship between the size of the primary afferent arbors and autonomic dysreflexia. At 2 weeks after milder (20-g) clip injury at T4, rats exhibited responses to colon distension that were not those associated with autonomic dysreflexia (n = 5). Arterial pressure increased by only 16 +/- 3 mmHg and heart rate tended to increase (+19 +/- 12 beats/min). These rats attained a locomotor score of 7.1 +/- 0.4 by 2 weeks. The lesions at the injury site also contained necrosis and mild cavitation within the gray matter. No change in the small-diameter afferent arbor was detected at 2 weeks after the 20-g clip injury at T4 (n = 6 rats). These findings suggest that after severe but not mild clip compression injury of the spinal cord, sprouting of the afferent component of the spinal reflex are contributes to the development of autonomic dysreflexia. Neither dysreflexia, nor changes in the afferent arbor size occurred after mild cord injury. This clinically relevant clip compression cord injury model, studied more frequently for locomotor function, is excellent for investigating mechanisms for the development of autonomic dysreflexia and strategies for its prevention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".