MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1494081372 · doi:10.1089/08977150152693782

Autonomic Dysreflexia and Primary Afferent Sprouting after Clip-Compression Injury of the Rat Spinal Cord

2001· article· en· W1494081372 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurotrauma · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalWestern University
FundersOntario Neurotrauma FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsAutonomic dysreflexiaSpinal cord injuryMedicineSpinal cordAnesthesiaCordLesionAnatomySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinal cord injury leads to many forms of autonomic dysfunction including autonomic dysreflexia, a condition involving recurrent episodes of paroxysmal hypertension and associated bradycardia. This hypertension may reach intensities that are life-threatening. We investigated autonomic dysreflexia and the sprouting of central processes of primary afferent neurons (a potential mechanism for autonomic dysreflexia) in a clinically-relevant calibrated clip-compression model of spinal cord injury in the rat. Autonomic dysreflexia was induced by colon distension in the conscious rats 2 weeks after severe (50-g) clip compression injury of the spinal cord at the 4th thoracic segment. The central arbor of small-diameter primary afferent fibers in laminae III-VII of the spinal cord dorsal horn was also assessed at 2 weeks after cord injury by quantitative morphometry, using calcitonin gene-related peptide as a marker. In response to colon distension, arterial pressure increased by 41 +/- 3 mmHg from a resting value of 109 +/- 4 mmHg, and heart rate decreased by 124 +/- 13 beats/min from a value of 515 +/- 16 beats/min (n = 7). Minimal locomotor function was recovered by these rats: by 2 weeks after injury they attained scores of only 3.1 +/- 1.3 on the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan scale. Histopathology of the clip-compression lesion site in the cord consisted of extensive central necrosis extending several segments rostral and caudal to the lesion. Quantitative measures of the small-diameter afferent arbors revealed significant increases in area ranging from 20-27% in thoracolumbar segments caudal to the injury (n = 5) in comparison to sham-injured rats (n = 6). A second study was done to assess the impact of severity of injury on the relationship between the size of the primary afferent arbors and autonomic dysreflexia. At 2 weeks after milder (20-g) clip injury at T4, rats exhibited responses to colon distension that were not those associated with autonomic dysreflexia (n = 5). Arterial pressure increased by only 16 +/- 3 mmHg and heart rate tended to increase (+19 +/- 12 beats/min). These rats attained a locomotor score of 7.1 +/- 0.4 by 2 weeks. The lesions at the injury site also contained necrosis and mild cavitation within the gray matter. No change in the small-diameter afferent arbor was detected at 2 weeks after the 20-g clip injury at T4 (n = 6 rats). These findings suggest that after severe but not mild clip compression injury of the spinal cord, sprouting of the afferent component of the spinal reflex are contributes to the development of autonomic dysreflexia. Neither dysreflexia, nor changes in the afferent arbor size occurred after mild cord injury. This clinically relevant clip compression cord injury model, studied more frequently for locomotor function, is excellent for investigating mechanisms for the development of autonomic dysreflexia and strategies for its prevention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it