Combined Therapy with Corticosteroids and Vasopressin in a Patient with Septic Shock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Septic shock is a critical physiological state of infection-related inadequacy of tissue perfusion and hypotension that is often refractory to fluid resuscitation.1 It is associated with a high mortality rate, especially in the setting of multiorgan dysfunction and if the initial antimicrobial therapy administered is inappropriate.2,3 Appropriate antimicrobial therapy is the cornerstone of treatment, but adjunctive approaches have also been explored in recent years. Impairment of endogenous adrenal function and vasopressin deficiency are common in patients with septic shock.4,5 Exogenous supplementation with corticosteroids had a proven mortality benefit in a specific set of critically ill patients,6 and the benefits of vasopressin are slowly emerging.7 However, the net effect of combination treatment with exogenous corticosteroids and vasopressin in patients with septic shock is unknown. This report documents a case in which combination therapy was employed, and the literature on corticosteroid and vasopressin supplementation in septic shock is reviewed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".