MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1495266837

Construyendo el Programa para la Evaluación Internacional de Estudiantes de la OCDE (PISA)

2013· article· es· W1495266837 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience, Technology, and Education in Latin America
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo propone un marco conceptual que se nutre de la economía política, las relaciones
\ninternacionales y las disciplinas de la sociología. El contexto económico-político sitúa PISA dentro
\nde una racionalidad política más amplia del neoliberalismo. Las relaciones internacionales arrojan
\nuna luz sobre el papel que juega la influencia estadounidense en la construcción de PISA y, más
\ngeneralmente, en el gobierno de las organizaciones internacionales. Las teorías derivadas de la
\nsociología de la ciencia y la tecnología, y de la conceptualización de Michel Foucault de la
\nformación de bloques de poder, proporcionan una comprensión de cómo “funciona” PISA y cómo se
\nutiliza para ejercer el poder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.043
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it