Les représentations de l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes de jeunes montréalais issus de l’immigration : illustrations et réflexions à travers le prisme de la communication interculturelle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question de l’egalite entre les femmes et les hommes occupe une place importante dans l’espace public quebecois. Dans cet article, nous proposons d’explorer les differentes visions de l’egalite entre les femmes et les hommes d’individus appartenant a un groupe social particulier : celui des jeunes adultes montrealais âges de 16 a 22 ans et issus de l’immigration. En nous appuyant sur leurs propos, nous proposons au lecteur une reflexion en deux temps. Nous examinons d’abord la facon dont les jeunes articulent et mobilisent leurs differentes appartenances sociales lorsqu’ils abordent la question de l’egalite. Par la suite, nous soumettons nos reflexions et questionnements concernant les defis associes a la pluralite des appartenances dans le cadre de la recherche en communication interculturelle, en abordant entre autres les processus d’assignation identitaire pouvant etre lies a ces demarches de recherche. The issue of equality between women and men is an important one in the Quebec public spectrum. In this article, we propose to explore different visions of equality between women and men expressed by young Montrealers aged from 16 to 22 years-old who are immigrants or members of ethnocultural communities. Relying on their discourses, we offer the reader an analysis in two steps. We first consider how young people articulate and mobilize their different social belongings when addressing the issue of equality. Secondly, we share our thoughts and questions about the challenges associated with the plurality of social belongings in the context of intercultural communication research. The process of identity assignment is examined more specifically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it