MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of environmental conditions on sex allocation in the black rhinoceros population of Mkhuze Game Reserve, South Africa

2011· article· en· W1495618897 on OpenAlexaff
Robert B. Weladji, Karine Laflamme-Mayer

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrican Journal of Ecology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSex allocationRhinocerosPopulationSex ratioGame reserveGeographyDemographyBiologyEcologyWildlife

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the Trivers–Willard and local resource competition (LRC) hypotheses, for species where reproductive success is more variable in one sex, natural selection may lead to a bias in sex allocation of a female’s offspring according to her body condition. The extrinsic modification hypothesis (EMH) suggests that offspring sex can also be influenced by environmental conditions experienced by mothers. We investigated the influence of rainfall, El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), population size and burning, in the year before conception and during pregnancy, on sex allocation in the black rhinoceros population of Mkhuze Game Reserve, South Africa, during 1970–2007. Females were more likely to have a male calf as rainfall during pregnancy increased, supporting the Trivers–Willard hypothesis. Also, the probability of having a male calf increased with population size, supporting the LRC hypothesis. Calf sex allocation was not influenced by ENSO. In conclusion, local environmental conditions may influence sex allocation in black rhinoceros, thereby supporting the EMH. Burning and population size may influence sex allocation in black rhinoceros, and yet can be manipulated by managers. Thus, this knowledge can be applied to improve population structure assessments and management regimes, especially in enclosed reserves, which is essential to maintain endangered species’ productivity. Selon l’hypothèse de Trivers-Willard et celle de la compétition pour les ressources locales (LRC), pour des espèces où le succès reproducteur est plus variable chez un des sexes, la sélection naturelle peut entraîner un biais dans la détermination du sexe de la descendance d’une femelle selon sa condition physique. L’hypothèse de modification extrinsèque (EMH) suggère que le sexe de la progéniture peut aussi être influencé par les conditions environnementales rencontrées par les mères. Nous avons étudié l’influence de la pluviométrie, du phénomène d’oscillation australe d’El Nino(ENSO), de la taille de la population et des feux contrôlés, dans l’année qui précède la conception et au cours de la gestation, sur la détermination du sexe dans la population de rhinos noirs de la Réserve de chasse de Mkhuze, en Afrique du Sud, entre 1970 et 2007. Les femelles étaient plus susceptibles de donner naissance à des mâles lorsque la pluviométrie durant la gestation augmentaient, ce qui conforte l’hypothèse de Trivers-Willard. La probabilité de donner naissance à un mâle augmentait aussi avec la taille de la population, ce qui conforte l’hypothèse de LRC. L’allocation du sexe du jeune n’était pas influencée par l’ENSO. En conclusion, les conditions environnementales locales peuvent influencer la détermination du sexe du jeune chez le rhinocéros noir, supportant ainsi l’EMH. Les feux contrôlés et la taille de la population influencent l’allocation du sexe chez le rhinocéros noir, et peuvent être manipulés par les gestionnaires. Donc cette information peut être utilisée pour améliorer les évaluations de structure de population et les régimes de gestion, particuliérement dans les réserves clôturées, ce qui est essentiel pour préserver la productivité des espéces menacées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrican Journal of EcologySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207